Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Kid Talk

The following exchange took place between my wife (a math teacher) and my teenage daughter after a math homework session:
Mom: How often do you get to talk through solving your math problems?
Teen: We don't
Mom: You don't get to talk?
Teen: No, but we ask each other anyway
Mom:  How does the teacher know if you have problems or questions?
Teen: You're supposed to go up and ask - if you don't know and don't ask, it's your own fault.

Really?  I hope this isn't the case - but it is at least one student's perceptions.  We need to extinguish the sage on the stage mentality and get students talking.  How can we expect students to learn by sitting and listening with only quiet seat work to follow?  Is that how you learn?  Is that how anyone learns?  Humans are verbal creatures - we learn by talking (and doing).

Our staff has been training engagement techniques over the past several months that promote student talk.  I thought this would be a good time to list a few and consider how these techniques could change the above conversation.  All of these techniques get kids talking and many of them promote physical movement.  See how many you recognize or call by another name:

Inside - Outside Circle: two circles of students facing each other for verbal review.
Clock Partners: students paired for reflection/review based on "appointments".
Choral Response: whole class response technique when answers are short and the same.
I have...Who has...: structured verbal review of important concepts.
Musical Cards: students trade concept cards while music is playing, then pair to discuss.
Line-ups: students line up according to degrees of agreement, then discuss viewpoints.
Run the Tournament: students discuss important concepts and determine winners that advance in the tournament.
Academic Games: Pyramid game, taboo, Who am I?: each game requires students to verbalize answers.

So, why would we want to get kids up and moving and talking when we have them quiet and look like they are paying attention?  Because the brain needs processing time; the brain will drop concepts that are not processed.  Academic talk provides processing and results in greater engagement and retention of both concepts and skills. Ever talk your way through a difficult task or chore?  Talk's not just for memorizing jargon.

So how prevalent are these practices?  Are students expected to still stay in their seats, listen and do quiet seat work?  The teachers who have tried these techniques report positive results from their students and indicate their classes are more enjoyable.  We've learned it doesn't take much to implement; teachers just need to try a few things. 

So maybe the conversation could go like this:
Mom: How often do you get to talk through solving your math problems?
Teen: All the time.
Mom: How?
Teen: We work in partners, we trade up all the time, we talk about how to get answers.
Mom:  So what does your teacher do?
Teen:  Most of the time the teacher just listens and if somebody is wrong they get help right there, or the teacher goes over it with the class.

1 comment:

  1. Thanks for this post about the importance of student discussion! Not so long ago, I heard Kevin Feldman, a prominent literacy expert, talk about the importance of STRUCTURED academic discourse. His idea centered on the idea that teachers can elevate student discussions from "chats" to "academic discourse" through relatively simple strategies. For example, being intentional when partnering students can make a significant difference in engagement. (Feldman and others recommend pairing our lowest achieving students with our most gracious middle-performing students.) Another strategy teachers might employ is the sentence stem. Asking students to respond using a teacher-provided sentence stem (e.g. "I agree with the assertion because...") helps students speak complete thoughts and practice using sophisticated academic vocabulary in context.

    Thanks, Toby!

    ReplyDelete